彭伟¹;殷悦¹;沈仪扬¹;毕玉²

• 1:常州大学 商学院，江苏 常州 213164
• 2:南京理工大学 经济管理学院，江苏 南京 210094

摘要(Abstract)：

社会创业对解决社会问题、推动社会可持续发展意义重大。社会创业嵌入在独特的创业生态系统中，其中各要素如何驱动区域社会创业活跃度是学界尚未理清的问题。基于创业生态系统视角，整合政府支持、市场规模、金融服务、人力资本、文化基础多层面要素，运用模糊集定性比较分析方法，以中国31省份的数据为样本，探讨驱动区域社会创业活跃度的复杂因果机制。研究发现：（1）单个创业生态系统要素不构成产生高社会创业活跃度和非高社会创业活跃度的必要条件。（2）产生高社会创业活跃度的创业生态系统有两种，即政府支持下市场—文化驱动型和政府支持下人力—文化驱动型。（3）产生非高社会创业活跃度的创业生态系统有五种，且与产生高社会创业活跃度的创业生态系统存在因果非对称关系。本研究引入组态视角，探究创业生态系统对区域社会创业活跃度的多重驱动路径。研究结论揭示了区域高社会创业活跃度的创业生态系统实现路径，为处于不同创业生态系统的区域提高社会创业活跃度提供理论指导。

关键词(KeyWords)： 创业生态系统;社会创业;创业活跃度;模糊集定性比较分析

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金重点项目（19AGL006）；江苏高校“青蓝工程”项目（2022）；江苏省社科优青项目（2019）；江苏省研究生科研创新项目（KYCX21_2763）

作者(Authors): 彭伟¹;殷悦¹;沈仪扬¹;毕玉²

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20220613.402

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 杜运周, 李佳馨, 刘秋辰, 等. 复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法: 研究进展与未来方向[J]. 管理世界,2021, 37(3): 180-197, 12-13
  [2] 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界,2020, 36(9): 141-155
  [3] 姜诗尧, 刘振. 基于调节焦点视角的创业意图形成机理研究[J]. 管理学报,2021, 18(12): 1807-1813
  [4] 刘振, 胡爽. 破局: 以社会创业为“双创拐点”[J]. 清华管理评论,2020, (6): 44-49
  [5] 刘振, 肖应钊, 张玉利. 亲社会动机对社会创业双重导向的影响机理研究——市场化程度与工作经验隶属性的调节作用模型[J]. 南开管理评论,2021, 24(2): 184-194, 213, 195-196
  [6] 刘志阳, 许莉萍. 制度与社会创业: 基于文献的整合框架[J]. 经济管理,2022, 44(1): 192-208
  [7] 项国鹏, 曾传圣. 国外创业生态系统研究最新进展及未来展望[J]. 科技进步与对策,2020, 37(14): 151-160
  [8] 谢智敏, 王霞, 杜运周, 等. 创业生态系统如何促进城市创业质量——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2020, 41(11): 68-82
  [9] 徐虹, 张妍, 翟燕霞. 社会创业研究回顾与展望[J]. 经济管理,2020, 42(11): 193-208
  [10] 杨英, 李岩, 张秀娥, 等. 正式制度与非正式制度如何驱动社会创业——基于效率驱动型国家的QCA研究[J]. 科技进步与对策,2021, 38(3): 21-29
  [11] 张三保, 康璧成, 张志学. 中国省份营商环境评价: 指标体系与量化分析[J]. 经济管理,2020, 42(4): 5-19
  [12] 郑刚, 陈箫, 胡珊. 社会创业、合法性构建与社会企业成长——基于深圳残友集团的纵向案例研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2022, 43(1): 124-137
  [13] Canestrino R, Ćwiklicki M, Magliocca P, et al. Understanding social entrepreneurship: A cultural perspective in business research[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 110: 132-143
  [14] Choi D, Park J. Local government as a catalyst for promoting social enterprise[J]. Public Management Review,2021, 23(5): 665-686
  [15] Dacin M T, Dacin P A, Tracey P. Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions[J]. Organization Science,2011, 22(5): 1203-1213
  [16] Gupta P, Chauhan S, Paul J, et al. Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 113: 209-229
  [17] Haugh H, Robson P, Hagedoorn J, et al. The nascent ecology of social enterprise[J]. Small Business Economics,2022, 58(3): 1223-1242
  [18] Hoogendoorn B. The prevalence and determinants of social entrepreneurship at the macro level[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2016, 54(S1): 278-296
  [19] Jia X P. Priming the pump of impact entrepreneurship and social finance in China[J]. Agriculture and Human Values,2020, 37(4): 1293-1311
  [20] Kachlami H, Yazdanfar D, Öhman P. Regional demand and supply factors of social entrepreneurship[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,2018, 24(3): 714-733
  [21] Mickiewicz T, Nyakudya F W, Theodorakopoulos N, et al. Resource endowment and opportunity cost effects along the stages of entrepreneurship[J]. Small Business Economics,2017, 48(4): 953-976
  [22] Pathak S, Muralidharan E. Informal institutions and their comparative influences on social and commercial entrepreneurship: The role of in-group collectivism and interpersonal trust[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2016, 54(S1): 168-188
  [23] Pathak S, Muralidharan E. Economic inequality and social entrepreneurship[J]. Business & Society,2018, 57(6): 1150-1190
  [24] Ragin C C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  [25] Rawhouser H, Cummings M, Newbert S L. Social impact measurement: Current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2019, 43(1): 82-115
  [26] Rihoux B, Ragin C C. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 2009.
  [27] Sahasranamam S, Nandakumar M K. Individual capital and social entrepreneurship: Role of formal institutions[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020, 107: 104-117
  [28] Sahasranamam S, Nandakumar M K, Pereira V, et al. Knowledge capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship: Investigating the role of informal institutions[J]. Journal of International Management,2021, 27(1): 100833
  [29] Santos F J, de la O Barroso M, Guzmán C. The global economy and social entrepreneurship[J]. Revista de Economia Mundial,2013, 35: 177-196
  [30] Spilling O R. The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event[J]. Journal of Business Research,1996, 36(1): 91-103
  [31] Stam E, van de Ven A. Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements[J]. Small Business Economics,2021, 56(2): 809-832
  [32] Stephan U, Uhlaner L M, Stride C. Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2015, 46(3): 308-331
  [33] Sud M, VanSandt C V, Baugous A M. Social entrepreneurship: The role of institutions[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2009, 85(S1): 201-216
  [34] Suresh J, Ramraj R. Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success[J]. European Journal of Business and Management,2012, 4(16): 95-101
  [35] Zahra S A, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum D O, et al. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(5): 519-532
  [36] Zahra S A, Wright M. Entrepreneurship’s next act[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2011, 25(4): 67-83