刘志阳^1;2;赵陈芳^1;2;李斌^1;2

• 1:上海财经大学 商学院，上海 200433
• 2:上海财经大学 中国社会创业研究中心，上海 200433

摘要(Abstract)：

数字技术深刻地重塑了发现和利用机会的方式，利用数字力量加快社会创业发展是创业研究前沿。数字社会创业是以解决复杂社会问题为使命，将数字技术与社会创业相融合，推动社会创业机会、资源、治理和价值测量的数字化，从而更有效实现混合价值的新型创业活动。相较社会创业和数字创业，数字社会创业具有社会问题对接智能化、社会问题响应实时化、社会价值可视化以及社会创业增长指数化等核心特征。本文首次构建了包含数字社会创业内涵、过程要素及其运行机制的研究框架。该框架认为数字社会创业由数字社会创业者、数字社会公民、数字社会创业平台以及数字社会创业治理四个要素组成，形成了机会—资源智能一体化、赋能—规制孪生化、混合价值共创化和社会影响力规模化等独特运行机制。数字社会创业运行过程本质是社会创业者借助数字化手段主动进行混合价值创造，数字社会公民自下而上参与价值扩散，数字社会创业平台推动价值共享与治理完善的价值提升过程。未来数字社会创业研究迫切需要在混合价值逻辑和数字技术视域下构建整体化、情景化、问题化和情感化的研究新范式。本文研究扩展了社会创业和数字创业的研究内涵，对于推动社会创业的数字化应用也具有重要现实价值。

关键词(KeyWords)： 数字社会创业;数字创业;社会创业;社会企业

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金项目（15BGL166）

作者(Authors): 刘志阳^1;2;赵陈芳^1;2;李斌^1;2

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200228.402

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 蔡莉, 杨亚倩, 卢珊, 等. 数字技术对创业活动影响研究回顾与展望[J]. 科学学研究,2019a, (10): 1816-1824+1835
  [2] 蔡莉, 葛宝山, 蔡义茹. 中国转型经济背景下企业创业机会与资源开发行为研究[J]. 管理学季刊,2019b, (2): 44-62, 134
  [3] 刘志阳, 李斌, 陈和午. 企业家精神视角下的社会创业研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, (11): 171-173
  [4] 刘志阳, 庄欣荷, 李斌. 地理范围、注意力分配与社会企业使命偏离[J]. 经济管理,2019, (8): 73-90
  [5] 陶秋燕, 高腾飞. 社会创新: 源起、研究脉络与理论框架[J]. 外国经济与管理,2019, (6): 85-104
  [6] Akemu O, Whiteman G, Kennedy S. Social enterprise emergence from social movement activism: The fairphone case[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2016, 53(5): 846-877
  [7] Amit R, Han X. Value creation through novel resource configurations in a digitally enabled world[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2017, 11(3): 228-242
  [8] Amit R, Zott C. Crafting business architecture: The antecedents of business model design[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(4): 331-350
  [9] André K, Pache A C. From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2016, 133(4): 659-675
  [10] Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2018, 12(1): 72-95
  [11] Bacq S, Eddleston K A. A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: How stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2018, 152(3): 589-611
  [12] Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A C, et al. Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015, 58(6): 1658-1685
  [13] Bavdaz A. Past and recent conceptualisations of sociomateriality and its features: Review[J]. Athens Journal of Social Sciences,2018, 5(1): 51-78
  [14] Calton J M, Werhane P H, Hartman L P, et al. Building partnerships to create social and economic value at the base of the global development pyramid[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2013, 117(4): 721-733
  [15] de Moraes J A, de Andrade E B. Who are the citizens of the digital citizenship[J]. International Review of Information Ethics,2015, 23: 4-19
  [16] Dees J G. A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 111(3): 321-334
  [17] Dutton W H, Blank G. Cultures on the Internet[J]. InterMedia, Winter,2014, 42(4-5): 55-57
  [18] Ebrahim A, Battilana J, Mair J. The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations[J]. Research in Organizational Behavior,2014, 34: 81-100
  [19] Gopalkrishnan S S. A new resource for social entrepreneurs: Technology[J]. American Journal of Management,2013, 13(1): 66-78
  [20] Grund T, Waloszek C, Helbing D. How natural selection can create both self-and other-regarding preferences and networked minds[J]. Scientific Reports,2013, 3(1): 1480
  [21] Hanseth O, Lyytinen K. Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2010, 25(1): 1-19
  [22] Hermsen S, Frost J, Renes R J, et al. Using feedback through digital technology to disrupt and change habitual behavior: A critical review of current literature[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2016, 57: 61-74
  [23] Hinings B, Gegenhuber T, Greenwood R. Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(1): 52-61
  [24] Hockerts K, Wüstenhagen R. Greening goliaths versus emerging davids — theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2010, 25(5): 481-492
  [25] Hockerts K. Determinants of social entrepreneurial intentions[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(1): 105-130
  [26] Hsieh Y J, Wu Y J. Entrepreneurship through the platform strategy in the digital era: Insights and research opportunities[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2019, 95: 315-323
  [27] Iansiti M, Levien R. Strategy as ecology[J]. Harvard business review,2004, 82(3): 68-78, 126
  [28] Isin E, Ruppert E. Being digital citizens[M]. Rowman & Littlefield International, 2015.
  [29] Kistruck G M, Beamish P W. The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice,2010, 34(4): 735-761
  [30] Ko W W, Liu G. Understanding the process of knowledge spillovers: Learning to become social enterprises[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(3): 263-285
  [31] Kraus S, Niemand T, Halberstadt J, et al. Social entrepreneurship orientation: Development of a measurement scale[J]. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research,2017, 23(6): 977-997
  [32] Lezaun J, Soneryd L. Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics[J]. Public Understanding of Science,2007, 16(3): 279-297
  [33] Li L, Su F, Zhang W, et al. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective[J]. Information Systems Journal,2018, 28(6): 1129-1157
  [34] Mair J, Sharma S. Performance measurement and social entrepreneurship[M]. Social entrepreneurship and social business. Gabler Verlag, 2012: 175-189.
  [35] Marres N. The redistribution of methods: On intervention in digital social research, broadly conceived[J]. The Sociological Review,2012, 60(S1): 139-165
  [36] Miller T L, Grimes M G, McMullen J S, et al. Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship[J]. Academy of Management Review,2012, 37(4): 616-640
  [37] Mossberger K, Tolbert C J, McNeal R S. Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2007.
  [38] Muafi M. Green IT empowerment, social capital, creativity and innovation: A case study of creative city, Bantul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management,2015, 8(3): 719-737
  [39] Nambisan S, Sawhney M. Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field[J]. Academy of management perspectives,2011, 25(3): 40-57
  [40] Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2017, 41(6): 1029-1055
  [41] Nambisan S. Architecture vs. ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(2): 104-106
  [42] Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy,2019, 48(8): 103773
  [43] Orlikowski W J. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work[J]. Organization Studies,2007, 28(9): 1435-1448
  [44] Orlikowski W J, Scott S V. Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization[J]. The Academy of Management Annals,2008, 2(1): 433-474
  [45] Pache A C, Santos F. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013, 56(4): 972-1001
  [46] Poortinga W. Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital[J]. Health & place,2012, 18(2): 286-295
  [47] Priem R L. A consumer perspective on value creation[J]. Academy of Management Review,2007, 32(1): 219-235
  [48] Saebi T, Foss N J, Linder S. Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises[J]. Journal of Management,2019, 45(1): 70-95
  [49] Santos F M. A positive theory of social entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012, 111(3): 335-351
  [50] Schradie J. The digital production gap: The digital divide and Web 2.0 collide[J]. Poetics,2011, 39(2): 145-168
  [51] Srinivasan A, Venkatraman N. Entrepreneurship in digital platforms: A network-centric view[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2018, 12(1): 54-71
  [52] Steininger D M. Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research[J]. Information Systems Journal,2019, 29(2): 363-407
  [53] Sussan F, Acs Z J. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem[J]. Small Business Economics,2017, 49(1): 55-73
  [54] Symon G, Whiting R. The sociomaterial negotiation of social entrepreneurs’ meaningful work[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2019, 56(3): 655-684
  [55] Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda[J]. Information systems research,2010, 21(4): 748-759
  [56] Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush A A. Research commentary: Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 675-687
  [57] Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 724-735
  [58] Young D R, Lecy J D. Defining the universe of social enterprise: Competing metaphors[J]. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,2014, 25(5): 1307-1332
  [59] Zahra S A, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum D O, et al. A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(5): 519-532