徐广平^1;2;张金山^1;2;杜运周³

• 1:吉林大学 商学院，吉林 长春 130012
• 2:吉林大学 中以创新创业合作研究中心，吉林 长春 130012
• 3:东南大学 经济管理学院，江苏 南京 210096

摘要(Abstract)：

公司创业已成为新时期推动企业塑造新优势的重要手段，然而，对于如何激活公司创业这一问题一直没有得到有效解决。本文以20家企业为案例样本，运用模糊集的定性比较分析方法，探讨了环境与组织两个层面的五个条件的组态效应对公司创业活跃度差异的多重并发因素和因果复杂机制。研究发现：（1）机会识别能力是影响高公司创业活跃度的必要条件；缺乏内部创业文化是导致非高公司创业活跃度的必要条件。（2）高公司创业活跃度的驱动机制分为3条路径，揭示了五个条件因素的不同组态可以产生多种实现高公司创业活跃度的路径。（3）非高公司创业活跃度的驱动机制分为2条路径，且与高公司创业活跃度的驱动机制存在非对称因果关系。本文的研究结论有助于拓展环境与组织匹配的创业视角，为企业如何有效激发创业活力提供了有价值的启示。

关键词(KeyWords)： 内部创业文化;机会识别能力;资源整合能力;员工敬业度;公司创业环境;fsQCA

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目（71672033）；吉林省社会科学基金项目（2017B78）；吉林大学研究生创新基金资助项目（101832018C156）

作者(Authors): 徐广平^1;2;张金山^1;2;杜运周³

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190909.001

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 程建青, 罗瑾琏, 杜运周, 等. 制度环境与心理认知何时激活创业?——一个基于QCA方法的研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2019, (2): 114-131
  [2] 董保宝. 公司创业模型回顾与比较[J]. 外国经济与管理,2012, (2): 9-26
  [3] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界,2017, (6): 155-167
  [4] 孙秀丽, 赵曙明, 白晓明. 制度支持、高管团队冒险倾向与公司创业关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2018, (12): 123-130
  [5] 赵兴庐, 刘衡, 张建琦. 冗余如何转化为公司创业?——资源拼凑和机会识别的双元式中介路径研究[J]. 外国经济与管理,2017, (6): 54-67
  [6] 周翔, 罗顺均, 吴能全, 等. 核心能力快速丧失企业的公司创业——基于海印商业运营的公司创业纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, (6): 157-172, 181
  [7] Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2003, 18(1): 105-123
  [8] Arz C. Mechanisms of organizational culture for fostering corporate entrepreneurship: A systematic review and research agenda[J]. Journal of Enterprising Culture,2017, 25(4): 361-409
  [9] Bird B. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention[J]. The Academy of Management Review,1988, 13(3): 442-453
  [10] Burgess C. Factors influencing middle managers’ ability to contribute to corporate entrepreneurship[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management,2013, 32: 193-201
  [11] Chandler G N, Jansen E. The founder’s self-assessed competence and venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,1992, 7(3): 223-236
  [12] Dess G G, Lumpkin G T. Research edge: The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship[J]. The Academy of Management Executive(1993-2005),2005, 19(1): 147-156
  [13] Fiss P C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(2): 393-420
  [14] Hansen D J, Shrader R, Monllor J. Defragmenting definitions of entrepreneurial opportunity[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2011, 49(2): 283-304
  [15] Hornsby J S, Kuratko D F, Zahra S A. Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2002, 17(3): 253-273
  [16] Hornsby J S, Kuratko D F, Holt D T, et al. Assessing a measurement of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2013, 30(5): 937-955
  [17] Kassa A G, Raju R S. Investigating the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and employee engagement[J]. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies,2015, 7(2): 148-167
  [18] Kraus S, Ribeiro-Soriano D, Schüssler M. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA)in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal,2018, 14(1): 15-33
  [19] LeBreton J M, Senter J L. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement[J]. Organizational Research Methods,2008, 11(4): 815-852
  [20] Lockwood N R. Leveraging employee engagement for competitive advantage[J]. Hr Magazine,2007, 52(3): 1-12
  [21] Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms[J]. Management Science,1983, 29(7): 770-791
  [22] Miocevic D, Morgan R E. Operational capabilities and entrepreneurial opportunities in emerging market firms[J]. International Marketing Review,2018, 35(2): 320-341
  [23] Nayager T, Van Vuuren J J. An analysis of an organisational strategy, structure and culture that supports corporate entrepreneurship in established organizations: Management[J]. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences,2005, 8(1): 29-38
  [24] Phan P H, Wright M, Ucbasaran D, et al. Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future directions[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2009, 24(3): 197-205
  [25] Ragin C C. Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
  [26] Romero-Martínez A M, Fernández-Rodríguez Z, Vázquez-Inchausti E. Exploring corporate entrepreneurship in privatized firms[J]. Journal of World Business,2010, 45(1): 2-8
  [27] Smith B R, Matthews C H, Schenkel M T. Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: The role of Tacitness and codification in opportunity identification[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2009, 47(1): 38-57
  [28] Sambrook S, Roberts C. Corporate entrepreneurship and organizational learning: A review of the literature and the development of a conceptual framework[J]. Strategic Change,2005, 14(3): 141-155
  [29] Schaufeli W B, Salanova M, González-Romá V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies,2002, 3(1): 71-92
  [30] Urban B, Wood E. The importance of opportunity recognition behaviour and motivators of employees when engaged in corporate entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Business Economics and Management,2015, 16(5): 980-994
  [31] Waldman D A, Ramírez G G, House R J, et al. Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2001, 44(1): 134-143
  [32] Zahra S A, Neubaum D O, Huse M. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems[J]. Journal of Management,2000, 26(5): 947-976