赵红丹,刘微微

• 1:上海大学管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

教练型领导是提升下属学习、工作能力与绩效的一系列实践过程,对创造力的提升具有重要指导意义,但是这方面的理论研究严重滞后于实践发展,教练型领导对团队创造力影响的研究尤为匮乏。本文基于社会学习理论并考虑学习导向情境,构建了教练型领导对团队创造力的影响机制模型,以来自团队主管与团队成员配对的73套样本,通过层级回归来检验假设。结果表明,教练型领导与团队创造力显著正相关,但这种影响是通过双元学习的中介作用发挥的。此外,团队学习目标导向调节着上述关系,具体地,在高学习目标导向的团队中,教练型领导通过双元学习影响团队创造力的中介效应显著;而在低学习目标导向的团队中,这一中介效应不显著。本文的研究结论不仅有助于丰富教练型领导影响效果的理论成果,而且为管理者有效提升团队创造力提供了新的参考与见解。

关键词(KeyWords)： 教练型领导;双元学习;团队创造力;团队学习目标导向;社会学习理论

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71772116);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71802087)

作者(Author): 赵红丹,刘微微

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.10.006

参考文献(References)：

• [1]陈建勋.组织学习的前因后果研究:基于二元视角[J].科研管理,2011,(6):140-149.
• [2]高媛,孟宪忠,谢佩洪.“利用”与“探索”在组织学习与技术创新领域的研究视角整合[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,(1):44-50.
• [3]刘新梅,韩骁,白杨,等.控制机制、组织双元与组织创造力的关系研究[J].科研管理,2013,(10):1-9.
• [4]罗瑾琏,门成昊,钟竞.动态环境下领导行为对团队创造力的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,(5):172-180.
• [5]王雁飞,张静茹,林星驰,等.教练型领导行为研究现状与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2016,(5):44-57.
• [6]许晖,李文.高科技企业组织学习与双元创新关系实证研究[J].管理科学,2013,(4):35-45.
• [7]徐莉.教练型领导的行为及适用情境分析[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2008,(2):113-117.
• [8]韵江,卢从超,杨柳.双元学习与创造力对绩效的影响--一个团队层面的研究[J].财经问题研究,2015,(5):3-11.
• [9]赵红丹,彭正龙.服务型领导与团队绩效:基于社会交换视角的解释[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,(10):2524-2532.
• [10]朱朝晖.探索性学习、挖掘性学习和创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2008,(4):860-867.
• [11]朱秀梅,孔祥茜,鲍明旭.学习导向与新企业竞争优势:双元创业学习的中介作用研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,(2):9-16.
• [12]Amabile T M.The social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983,45(2):357-376.
• [13]Atuahene-Gima K,Murray J Y.Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development:A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J].Journal of International Marketing,2007,15(2):1-29.
• [14]Baker W E,Sinkula J M.The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses[J].Journal of Small Business Management,2009,47(4):443-464.
• [15]Bandura A.Aggression:A social learning analysis[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1973.
• [16]Baron R M,Kenny D A.The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):1173-1182.
• [17]Buljac-Samardzic M,van Woerkom M.Can managers coach their teams too much?[J].Journal of Managerial Psychology,2015,30(3):280-296.
• [18]Burgelman R A,Grove A S.Let chaos reign,then rein in chaos-repeatedly:Managing strategic dynamics for corporatelongevity[J].Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(10):965-979.
• [19]Chen M H,Chang Y C.The dynamics of conflict and creativity during a project’s life cycle:A comparative study between service-driven and technology-driven teams in Taiwan[J].International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2005,13(2):127-150.
• [20]Edmondson A.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):350-383.
• [21]Edwards J R,Lambert L S.Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J].Psychological Methods,2007,12(1):1-22.
• [22]Ellinger A D,Ellinger A E,Keller S B.Supervisory coaching behavior,employee satisfaction,and warehouse employee performance:A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry[J].Human Resource Development Quarterly,2003,14(4):435-458.
• [23]Goleman D,Boyatzis R,McKee A.Primal leadership:The hidden driver of great performance[J].Harvard Business Review,2001,79(11):42-51.
• [24]Gong Y P,Kim T Y,Lee D R,et al.A multilevel model of team goal orientation,information exchange,and creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2013,56(3):827-851.
• [25]Hagen M S.Managerial coaching:A review of the literature[J].Performance Improvement Quarterly,2012,24(4):17-39.
• [26]Hirst G,Van Knippenberg D,Zhou J.A cross-level perspective on employee creativity:Goal orientation,team learning behavior,and individual creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):280-293.
• [27]Kim S.Assessing the influence of managerial coaching on employee outcomes[J].Human Resource Development Quarterly,2014,25(1):59-85.
• [28]March G J.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
• [29]Prieto-Pastor I,Martin-Perez V.Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning?The moderating role of management support[J].The International Journal of Human Resource Management,2015,26(5):589-615.
• [30]Sarin S,McDermott C.The effect of team leader characteristics on learning,knowledge application,and performance of crossfunctional new product development teams[J].Decision Sciences,2003,34(4):707-739.
• [31]Shalley C E,Zhou J,Oldham G R.The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity:Where should we go from here?[J].Journal of Management,2004,30(6):933-958.
• [32]Vandewalle D.Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement,1997,57(6):995-1015.