赵红丹,刘微微

• 1:上海大学 管理学院，上海 200444

摘要(Abstract)：

教练型领导是提升下属学习、工作能力与绩效的一系列实践过程，对创造力的提升具有重要指导意义，但是这方面的理论研究严重滞后于实践发展，教练型领导对团队创造力影响的研究尤为匮乏。本文基于社会学习理论并考虑学习导向情境，构建了教练型领导对团队创造力的影响机制模型，以来自团队主管与团队成员配对的73套样本，通过层级回归来检验假设。结果表明，教练型领导与团队创造力显著正相关，但这种影响是通过双元学习的中介作用发挥的。此外，团队学习目标导向调节着上述关系，具体地，在高学习目标导向的团队中，教练型领导通过双元学习影响团队创造力的中介效应显著；而在低学习目标导向的团队中，这一中介效应不显著。本文的研究结论不仅有助于丰富教练型领导影响效果的理论成果，而且为管理者有效提升团队创造力提供了新的参考与见解。

关键词(KeyWords)： 教练型领导;双元学习;团队创造力;团队学习目标导向;社会学习理论

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目（71772116）；国家自然科学基金青年项目（71802087）

作者(Author): 赵红丹,刘微微

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.10.006

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 陈建勋. 组织学习的前因后果研究:基于二元视角[J]. 科研管理,2011, (6):140-149
  [2] 高媛, 孟宪忠, 谢佩洪. "利用"与"探索"在组织学习与技术创新领域的研究视角整合[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2012, (1):44-50
  [3] 刘新梅, 韩骁, 白杨, 等. 控制机制、组织双元与组织创造力的关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2013, (10):1-9
  [4] 罗瑾琏, 门成昊, 钟竞. 动态环境下领导行为对团队创造力的影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,2014, (5):172-180
  [5] 王雁飞, 张静茹, 林星驰, 等. 教练型领导行为研究现状与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2016, (5):44-57
  [6] 许晖, 李文. 高科技企业组织学习与双元创新关系实证研究[J]. 管理科学,2013, (4):35-45
  [7] 徐莉. 教练型领导的行为及适用情境分析[J]. 中国青年政治学院学报,2008, (2):113-117
  [8] 韵江, 卢从超, 杨柳. 双元学习与创造力对绩效的影响——一个团队层面的研究[J]. 财经问题研究,2015, (5):3-11
  [9] 赵红丹, 彭正龙. 服务型领导与团队绩效:基于社会交换视角的解释[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2013, (10):2524-2532
  [10] 朱朝晖. 探索性学习、挖掘性学习和创新绩效[J]. 科学学研究,2008, (4):860-867
  [11] 朱秀梅, 孔祥茜, 鲍明旭. 学习导向与新企业竞争优势:双元创业学习的中介作用研究[J]. 研究与发展管理,2014, (2):9-16
  [12] Amabile T M. The social psychology of creativity:A componential conceptualization[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983, 45(2):357-376
  [13] Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J Y. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development:A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2007, 15(2):1-29
  [14] Baker W E, Sinkula J M. The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses[J]. Journal of Small Business Management,2009, 47(4):443-464
  [15] Bandura A. Aggression:A social learning analysis[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1973.
  [16] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986, 51(6):1173-1182
  [17] Buljac-Samardzic M, van Woerkom M. Can managers coach their teams too much?[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2015, 30(3):280-296
  [18] Burgelman R A, Grove A S. Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos-repeatedly:Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007, 28(10):965-979
  [19] Chen M H, Chang Y C. The dynamics of conflict and creativity during a project's life cycle:A comparative study between service-driven and technology-driven teams in Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,2005, 13(2):127-150
  [20] Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1999, 44(2):350-383
  [21] Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological Methods,2007, 12(1):1-22
  [22] Ellinger A D, Ellinger A E, Keller S B. Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance:A dyadic perspective in the distribution industry[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly,2003, 14(4):435-458
  [23] Goleman D, Boyatzis R, McKee A. Primal leadership:The hidden driver of great performance[J]. Harvard Business Review,2001, 79(11):42-51
  [24] Gong Y P, Kim T Y, Lee D R, et al. A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013, 56(3):827-851
  [25] Hagen M S. Managerial coaching:A review of the literature[J]. Performance Improvement Quarterly,2012, 24(4):17-39
  [26] Hirst G, Van Knippenberg D, Zhou J. A cross-level perspective on employee creativity:Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2009, 52(2):280-293
  [27] Kim S. Assessing the influence of managerial coaching on employee outcomes[J]. Human Resource Development Quarterly,2014, 25(1):59-85
  [28] March G J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science,1991, 2(1):71-87
  [29] Prieto-Pastor I, Martin-Perez V. Does HRM generate ambidextrous employees for ambidextrous learning? The moderating role of management support[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,2015, 26(5):589-615
  [30] Sarin S, McDermott C. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams[J]. Decision Sciences,2003, 34(4):707-739
  [31] Shalley C E, Zhou J, Oldham G R. The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity:Where should we go from here?[J]. Journal of Management,2004, 30(6):933-958
  [32] Vandewalle D. Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument[J]. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1997, 57(6):995-1015