齐舒婷^1;2;白新文¹;林琳³

• 1:中国科学院 心理研究所，北京 100101
• 2:中国科学院大学 心理学系，北京 100049
• 3:中央财经大学 商学院，北京 100081

摘要(Abstract)：

创意识别指对创意新颖性与实用性的评价与筛选，是连接创意产生和实施阶段的关键桥梁，引导组织创新的方向。本文系统整理了创意识别的研究现状和未来方向。基于现有文献，首先介绍了创意识别的内涵；而后提出了组织创新研究从创意产生到创意识别中的三大转变——参与主体、任务目标、作用机制；进而梳理了创意识别的评价主体、评价客体、人际与社会环境三类关键影响因素；随后总结了与创意识别相关的四个主要的研究视角；最后提出了未来研究需关注的六大重要议题。本文指出创意识别是组织创新研究的新方向，为本领域的研究和管理实践提供了新视角。

关键词(KeyWords)： 组织创造力;组织创新;创意识别;创意产生;创意实施

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目（71871214）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0802600）

作者(Authors): 齐舒婷^1;2;白新文¹;林琳³

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2019.07.003

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 陈姝, 刘伟, 王正斌. 消费者感知创新性研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理,2014, (10):3-12
  [2] 李阳, 白新文. 善心点亮创造力:内部动机和亲社会动机对创造力的影响[J]. 心理科学进展,2015, (2):175-181
  [3] 李艳, 杨百寅. 创意实施——创新研究未来走向[J]. 心理科学进展,2016, (4):643-653
  [4] Anderson N, Potočnik K, Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations:A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J]. Journal of Management,2014, 40(5):1297-1333
  [5] Antons D, Piller F T. Opening the black box of "not invented here":Attitudes, decision biases, and behavioral consequences[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2015, 29(2):193-217
  [6] Han J T, Long H Y, Pang W G. Putting raters in ratees' shoes:Perspective taking and assessment of creative products[J]. Creativity Research Journal,2017, 29(3):270-281
  [7] Huang L. The role of investor gut feel in managing complexity and extreme risk[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(5):1821-1847
  [8] Kwan L Y Y, Leung A K Y, Liou S. Culture, creativity, and innovation[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2018, 49(2):165-170
  [9] Li J C, Chen X P, Kotha S, et al. Catching fire and spreading it:a glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2017, 102(7):1075-1090
  [10] Lu S, Bartol K M, Venkataramani V, et al. Pitching novel ideas to the boss:The interactive effects of employees' idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2019, 62(2):579-606
  [11] Luksyte A, Unsworth K L, Avery D R. Innovative work behavior and sex-based stereotypes:Examining sex differences in perceptions and evaluations of innovative work behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2018, 39(3):292-305
  [12] McCarthy M, Chen C C, McNamee R C. Novelty and usefulness trade-off:Cultural cognitive differences and creative idea evaluation[J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2018, 49(2):171-198
  [13] Mueller J, Melwani S, Loewenstein J, et al. Reframing the decision-makers' dilemma:Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2018, 61(1):94-110
  [14] Perry-Smith J E, Mannucci P V. From creativity to innovation:The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey[J]. Academy of Management Review,2017, 42(1):53-79
  [15] Pier E L, Brauer M, Filut A, et al. Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2018, 115(12):2952-2957
  [16] Schuh S C, Zhang X A, Morgeson F P, et al. Are you really doing good things in your boss's eyes? Interactive effects of employee innovative work behavior and leader-member exchange on supervisory performance ratings[J]. Human Resource Management,2018, 57(1):397-409
  [17] Siler K, Lee K, Bero L. Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015, 112(2):360-365
  [18] Zhou J, Wang X M, Song L J, et al. Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2017, 102(2):180-202
  [19] Zhu Y X, Ritter S M, Müller B C N, et al. Creativity:Intuitive processing outperforms deliberative processing in creative idea selection[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,2017, 73:180-188